Background: The official current guideline for Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication is to use tetracycline–bismuth-based protocols as first line treatment due to the increasing incidence of clarithromycin resistance in the last decade. The unavailability of tetracycline and bismuth-containing medicines, however, is an issue in many countries, limiting the routine use of these protocols. The value of using additional probiotics in eradication protocols is also unclear. Direct comparison data on the effect of available bismuth compounds and different probiotic strains on eradication outcome are limited. Goal: The aim of our investigation was to find optimal eradication protocols, supplementations and treatment duration for routine clinical use in our gastroenterology unit, located in a highly clarithromycin-resistant and tetracycline–bismuth-naïve area. Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective real-world data analysis of 402 H. pylori positive patients between 2016 and 2024. H. pylori infection was diagnosed using histological examination of gastroscopy samples obtained from the gastric antrum. For the evaluation of treatment success or failure, 14C breath tests and stool H. pylori antigen tests were performed. Data on patient characteristics and treatment protocols were collected from our electronic patient record system, and treatment success was compared between the different treatment regimes. Results: Despite the regional clarithromycin resistance, supplementing clarithromycin-based regimens with bismuth and probiotic during the 14-day treatment duration showed a high and comparable cure rate when compared to tetracycline-based regimens, which are the current first-line therapies. When tetracycline-based combination is available, it is recommended to use it with an additional probiotic to achieve the best possible outcome. Comparison of the effect of available bismuth preparations on treatment success showed no significant difference. Generally, probiotic-containing protocols are more successful, compared to those treatments without this supplement. There was no statistical difference in the cure rates amongst the four probiotic strains used, where sample size allowed statistical analysis. Furthermore, supplementation with probiotics Lactobacillus reuteri ATCC PTA 6475 or Lactobacillus reuteri Protectis® DSM 17938 showed promising high treatment success rates (85.2% and 100.0%, respectively) in our study.
Gelley et al. (Fri,) studied this question.