This study investigates how the packaging image of agricultural products in livestreaming commerce influences consumers’ repurchase intentions and, on this basis, formulates effective packaging improvement strategies to enhance repurchase intention. Focusing on agricultural product packaging, we conducted an online survey of 392 consumers with livestream shopping experience and employed a combined approach of structural equation modeling (SEM) and artificial neural networks (ANNs) to analyze the effects of packaging image on repurchase intention. Starting from elements of packaging design—such as external appearance, cultural cues, imagery, and materials—we examined color schemes, typography, and illustration styles and further explored how these factors shape repurchase intention by elevating consumers’ perceived value. The findings indicate that the information-conveying functions of packaging—namely the communication of product culture, quality, and distinctive attributes—have a significant impact on repurchase intention. SEM results reveal that perceived value plays a pivotal mediating role between packaging image and repurchase intention. Complementarily, ANN analysis identifies visual appearance as the strongest predictor of repurchase intention among all packaging elements. Building on these insights, the study proposes concrete packaging design strategies, including optimizing visual appearance to highlight brand distinctiveness; distilling design symbols to narrate brand stories; and mining cultural connotations to strengthen cultural expression. This research not only verifies the importance of packaging design in boosting consumers’ repurchase intentions but also offers a practical strategic framework that can be extended to packaging design practices for other agricultural products. It provides new theoretical support and practical guidance for the field, offering a valuable reference for future research and practice.
Tang et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: