Motivation: Diagnostic accuracy for prostate cancer could be improved by quantitative assessment of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), but quality assurance would require an in vivo reference for each exam. Goal(s): Determine whether urinary bladder ADC is unbiased relative to normal saline across ADC fitting methods. Approach: In 103 prostate cancer patients, urinary bladder ADC was compared to ADC of normal saline in the balloon of an endorectal catheter. ADC fitting methods were compared across prostate regions. Results: Using weighted linear least-squares fitting and an intermediate range of b-values (100≤b≤600s/mm2), urinary bladder ADC is unbiased and fitting error is minimized. Impact: The urinary bladder serves as a reference sample for ADC, which will be necessary for quality assurance of ADC in prostate cancer diagnosis. Whether prostate ADC normalization by bladder ADC reduces interpatient variability can be investigated.
Lawrence et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: