The intensification of extreme hydrologic events, such as flash floods and landslides, has amplified the challenges of ensuring timely and effective emergency response. A key factor in the efficiency of such interventions is the accessibility of affected areas, which often becomes compromised during hazard events. In this context, the present study focuses on the Vărbilău River catchment in Romania, a region highly exposed to frequent flash floods and terrain instability. The research evaluates the spatial accessibility of emergency intervention units. Four major intervention centers were assessed under both normal and constrained scenarios. Accessibility was quantified through travel-time thresholds, incorporating variables such as road quality, network density, topography, and hazard-induced disruptions. Findings indicate that southern localities enjoy relatively short intervention times (less than 10 or between 10 and 20 min) due to favorable terrain and proximity to well-equipped centers. In such cases, the speed on main roads is 50–60 km/h, while the accessibility index is 5. Conversely, northern areas and villages like Lutu Roşu face elevated isolation risks, as single-road access and weak connectivity heighten their vulnerability during floods or landslides. In such cases, speeds reduce to 10 km/h and accessibility is very low, with the accessibility index of 1. Scenario modeling further demonstrated that the loss of key hubs (e.g., Ploieşti or Văleni) severely undermines coverage efficiency, particularly in high-risk zones, where the access times increases over 40 min. These results emphasize the need for dynamic intervention planning, infrastructure reinforcement, and the systematic integration of hazard-prone areas into emergency response strategies. Moreover, the methodological framework developed here can be adapted to other regions exposed to hydrologic hazards.
Popescu et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: