Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) are highly chemically stable synthetic compounds. They are widely used in industrial and commercial sectors due to their ability to repel water and oil, thermal stability, and surfactant properties. However, this stability results in environmental persistence and bioaccumulation, posing significant health risks as PFASs eventually find their way into environmental media. Key PFAS compounds, including PerFluoroOctanoic Acid (PFOA), PerFluoroOctane Sulfonic acid (PFOS), and PerFluoroHexane Sulfonic acid (PFHxS), have been linked to hepatotoxicity, immunotoxicity, neurotoxicity, and endocrine disruption. In response to the health threats these substances pose, global regulatory measures, such as the Stockholm Convention restrictions and national drinking water standards, have been implemented to reduce PFAS exposure. Despite these efforts, a lack of universally accepted definitions or comprehensive inventories of PFAS compounds hampers the effective management of these substances. As definitions differ across regulatory bodies, research and policy integration have become complicated. PFASs are broadly categorized as either perfluoroalkyl acids (PFAAs), precursors, or other fluorinated substances; however, PFASs encompass over 5000 distinct compounds, many of which are poorly characterized. PFAS contamination arises from direct industrial emissions and indirect environmental formation, these substances have been detected in water, soil, and even air samples from all over the globe, including from remote regions like Antarctica. Analytical methods, such as primarily liquid and gas chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry, have advanced PFAS detection. However, standardized monitoring protocols remain inadequate. Future management requires unified definitions, expanded monitoring efforts, and standardized methodologies to address the persistent environmental and health impacts of PFAS. This review underscores the need for improved regulatory frameworks and further research.
Song et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: