This study explores the potential of generative AI, specifically Large Language Models (LLMs), in automating unit test generation in Python 3.13. We analyze tests, both those created by programmers and those generated by LLM models, for fifty source code cases. Our main focus is on how the choice of model, the difficulty of the source code, and the prompting strategy influence the quality of the generated tests. The results show that AI models can help automate test creation for simple code, but their effectiveness decreases for more complex tasks. We introduce an embedding-based similarity analysis to assess how closely AI-generated tests resemble human-written ones, revealing that AI outputs often lack semantic diversity. The study also highlights the potential of AI models for rapid test prototyping, which can significantly speed up the software development cycle. However, further customization and training of the models on specific use cases is needed to achieve greater precision. Our findings provide practical insights into integrating LLMs into software testing workflows and emphasize the importance of prompt design and model selection.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Marcin Andrzejewski
Nina Dubicka
Capgemini (Netherlands)
Jędrzej Podolak
Capgemini (Netherlands)
Data
Silesian University of Technology
Capgemini (Netherlands)
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Andrzejewski et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/68dd91dafe798ba2fc49945e — DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/data10100156