In recent times, the various Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) mechanisms are fast becoming the best means of resolving family disputes. This is because family disputes are often confidential, and these ADR mechanisms encourage confidentiality. This paper analysed the viability of ADR as a means of resolving family disputes in Nigeria. It emphasised litigation’s limitations in resolving emotionally charged family matters and investigates how alternative dispute resolution can encourage confidentiality, party autonomy, and relationship maintenance. Using a comparative and doctrinal methodology, this study examined the acceptance and effectiveness of ADR in nations including the United Kingdom, the United States, and Finland. It also assessed Nigeria’s legislative framework governing matrimonial disputes, specifically the Matrimonial Causes Act (MCA) of 1970, as well as the feasibility of incorporating ADR into it. The study concluded that, while ADR has the potential to resolve marital maintenance, child custody, and property conflicts, statutory and cultural hurdles persist. The study concluded by recommending amendments to improve the legal recognition of ADR in family law and making practical recommendations to boost its usage in Nigeria.
A Tue, study studied this question.