PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 2, 2025Systems0 citationsOpen Access

A Hybrid System for Automated Assessment of Korean L2 Writing: Integrating Linguistic Features with LLM

View Full Paper
WHWon-Jin HurBJBongjun Ji

Key Points

  • The hybrid AES system significantly improves scoring accuracy in Korean L2 writing assessments.
  • System integrates linguistic features focusing on lexical diversity and syntactic complexity with a semantic relevance feature.
  • Machine learning models trained on the Korean Language Learner Corpus predict holistic scores on the TOPIK scale.
  • Integration of LLM enhances assessment alignment with human expert evaluations, addressing traditional grading limitations.

Abstract

The global expansion of Korean language education has created an urgent need for scalable, objective, and consistent methods for assessing the writing skills of non-native (L2) learners. Traditional manual grading is resource-intensive and prone to subjectivity, while existing Automated Essay Scoring (AES) systems often struggle with the linguistic nuances of Korean and the specific error patterns of L2 writers. This paper introduces a novel hybrid AES system designed specifically for Korean L2 writing. The system integrates two complementary feature sets: (1) a comprehensive suite of conventional linguistic features capturing lexical diversity, syntactic complexity, and readability to assess writing form and (2) a novel semantic relevance feature that evaluates writing content. This semantic feature is derived by calculating the cosine similarity between a student’s essay and an ideal, high-proficiency reference answer generated by a Large Language Model (LLM). Various machine learning models are trained on the Korean Language Learner Corpus from the National Institute of the Korean Language to predict a holistic score on the 6-level Test of Proficiency in Korean (TOPIK) scale. The proposed hybrid system demonstrates superior performance compared to baseline models that rely on either linguistic or semantic features alone. The integration of the LLM-based semantic feature provides a significant improvement in scoring accuracy, more closely aligning the automated assessment with human expert judgments. By systematically combining measures of linguistic form and semantic content, this hybrid approach provides a more holistic and accurate assessment of Korean L2 writing proficiency. The system represents a practical and effective tool for supporting large-scale language education and assessment, aligning with the need for advanced AI-driven educational technology systems.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Hur et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68de79685b556a9128e1a918https://doi.org/10.3390/systems13100851
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Greedy function approximation: A gradient boosting machine.2001 · 30,216 citations
  2. 2Another look at measures of forecast accuracy2006 · 5,603 citations
  3. 3Automated Essay Scoring (AES) Systems: Opportunities and Challenges for Open and Distance Education2022 · 13 citations
  4. 4Automatic analysis of syntactic complexity in second language writing2010 · 1,042 citations
  5. 5Corpus-informed application based on Korean Learners’ Corpus: substitution errors of topic and nominative markers2021 · 1 citations