Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
At the moment, Russian and foreign historiography is dominated by the attitude towards the Russian philosophy of unity as one of the schools that is of interest mainly to historians of philosophy. The author's projects “logic of all-unity” and “philosophy of neo-all-unitty” realize a fundamentally different attitude to the phenomenon of Russian philosophy of all-unity as an open project, which was only initiated by V.S. Solovyov and his followers. Within the framework of these projects, it is substantiated that the theoretical foundation of Russian philosophy of all-unity was a system of logical-philosophical concepts, which, as a whole, form a single system of non-classically rational type, the logic of all-unity. This system was isolated in its pure form and applied not only to a new interpretation of the Russian philosophy of all-unity, but also formed the basis of a new philosophical trend, the philosophy of neo-all-unity. The stage of further development of these projects is the formation of a new type of scientific knowledge of integral type, integral science. The article gives examples of construction of some sections of integral science, based on the logical means of the new formal axiomatic system – Projective Modal Ontology (PMO). Such sections as the theory of multi-unity, the logic of self-, other- and full-being, the logic of conditional and unconditional being, and the logic of the Absolute are briefly presented. In conclusion, an understanding of being as participation in the Absolute and a proof of the Absolute's being built on this basis are given. In this view, the ideas and methods of Russian philosophy of all-unity are still relevant and are in a state of constant rethinking and development.
V.I. Moiseev (Mon,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: