Confidants and Caregivers: Network Multiplexity and Subjective Well-Being of Older Adults

Abstract Objectives Older adults rely on personal networks for different types of support. Given shifts in family composition in later adulthood, more work is needed to map network members who can provide multiple aspects of support and the implications for older adults. We explore the phenomenon of having the same network members as both a confidant and a caregiver (multiplexity) and its implications for the well-being of older adults. Methods Using the 2011 National Health and Aging Trends Study, we describe the prevalence of having someone as both a confidant and a caregiver (henceforth “multiplex helper”) for older adults and examine its association with subjective well-being. We also investigate the differences by having whom as multiplex helpers. Results About three-quarters (76%) of older adults with at least 1 confidant and 1 caregiver have at least 1 multiplex helper. Partnered older adults are more likely to have any multiplex helpers than unpartnered counterparts and usually nominate their partner as a multiplex helper, whereas the unpartnered are more likely to rely on their children to serve multiple roles, especially for widowed older adults. Having a multiplex helper is associated with better subjective well-being. Discussion Network multiplexity is prevalent and positively associated with the subjective well-being of older adults who have at least 1 confidant and 1 caregiver, above and beyond having any confidants or caregivers separately. The baseline patterns established in this study lay the groundwork for future research to further explore support dynamics in older adults’ networks.