Absence of the State Immunity as a Prejudicial Fact Established by a Foreign Court Ruling

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

The article analyzes two judicial acts, in which two diametrically opposite approaches to determining the consequences of the conclusion contained in a foreign court decision on the absence of jurisdictional immunity of the state are applied. As a result, the outcome of the proceedings in the Court of Appeal of England in the case of Hulley Enterprises Ltd & Ors v The Russian Federation is prognosticated.

Bookmark

Cite This Study

Nikolay G. Eliseev (Thu,) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e5a80fb6db64358754240c https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18572/1812-3910-2024-3-15-18

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

1State immunity and arbitral awards: the decision of the English Court of appeal in <i>Hulley v Russia</i>2025
2Application of Estoppel in the English Court Judgment of 1 November 2023 on the Claim of the ex-Yukos Shareholders Against the Russian Federation2024
3Trends in the development of jurisdictional immunity of a foreign state under continental law2024 · 1 citations
4Evolution of the Doctrine of Jurisdictional Immunity of a Foreign State2024 · 1 citations
5Specific features of the Immunity from Jurisdiction and from Execution of International Organizations2026

Bookmark