We present a multimodal AI laboratory agent that captures and shares tacit experimental practice by linking written instructions with hands-on laboratory work through the analysis of video, speech, and text. While current AI tools have proven effective in literature analysis and code generation, they do not address the critical gap between documented knowledge and implicit lab practice. Our framework bridges this divide by integrating protocol generation directly from researcher-recorded videos, systematic detection of experimental errors, and evaluation of instrument readiness by comparing current performance against historical decisions. Evaluated in mass spectrometry-based proteomics, we demonstrate that the agent can capture and share practical expertise beyond conventional documentation and identify common mistakes, although domain-specific and spatial recognition should still be improved. This agentic approach enhances reproducibility and accessibility in proteomics and provides a generalizable model for other fields where complex, hands-on procedures dominate. This study lays the groundwork for community-driven, multimodal AI systems that augment rather than replace the rigor of scientific practice.
Skowronek et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: