Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
We compare the current de-facto standard for coil sensitivity calculation, ESPIRiT, to a non-linear reconstruction method, ENLIVE. While ENLIVE normally produces both images and coil sensitivies, we focus here on using it for calibration of the coil sensitivities. We applied ESPIRiT and ENLIVE to low-resolution subsets of a 3D Cartesian and a non-Cartesian spiral acquisition, using the resoluting coil profiles in a linear parallel imaging reconstruction. We showed that ENLIVE is substantially faster for a high number of channels and provides improved sensitivities in the non-Cartesian example.
Holme et al. (Wed,) studied this question.