Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Introduction: Hemorrhoids afflict a significant portion of the population, with a prevalence rate ranging from 4.4% to 3.6%.( The gold standard surgical approach for its treatment know as hemorrhoidectomy,In this study, we aim to compare Chivate's transanal suture rectopexy procedure with the gold standard open hemorrhoidectomy,considering their efficacy, safety profiles, surgical techniques, recovery periods, long-term outcomes, and patient satisfaction, to provide clinicians with valuable insights for decision-making in managing hemorrhoidal disease. Methodology:This is a prospective case – control study conducted at a single tertiary care centre.A total of 200 patients were included in the study between a period of January 2023 to December 2023 with the diagnosis of symptomatic grade 3 or grade 4 hemorrhoids. Results:A total of 200 patients were included in the study.Patient were allotted randomly into two groups. 100 patients underwent open hemorrhoidectomy and 100 patients underwent chivate's hemorrhoidectomy.In both the groups male predominance was noted.Majority of the patient presented between the age group of 35 – 44 years of age. Conclusion: Chivate's transanal suture mucopexy procedure emerges as a promising alternative to the conventional Milligan and Morgan hemorrhoidectomy, further research is warranted to validate the long-term efficacy and safety of Chivate's transanal suture mucopexy procedure, potentially revolutionizing the treatment paradigm for hemorrhoidal disease.
Hussain et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: