Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Diabetic Retinopathy stands as a leading cause of irreversible blindness, necessitating frequent examinations, especially in the early stages where effective treatments are available. However, current examination rates vary widely, ranging from 25–60%. This study scrutinizes the Point-of-Care Diabetic Retinopathy Examination Program at the University of Pittsburgh/UPMC, delving into its composition, evolution, challenges, solutions, and improvement opportunities. Employing a narrative approach, insights are gathered from key stakeholders, including ophthalmologists and staff from primary care clinics. A quantitative analysis from 2008 to 2020 provides a comprehensive overview of program outcomes, covering 94 primary care offices with 51 retinal cameras. Program components feature automated non-mydriatic 45° retinal cameras, a dedicated coordinator, rigorous training, and standardized workflows. Over this period, the program conducted 21,960 exams in 16,458 unique individuals, revealing a diverse population with an average age of 58.5 and a balanced gender distribution. Average body mass index (33.96±8.02 kg/m2) and hemoglobin A1c (7.58%±1.88%) surpassed normal ranges, indicating prevalent risk factors for diabetes-related complications. Notably, 24.2% of patients underwent more than one exam, emphasizing program engagement. Findings indicated that 86.3% of exams were gradable, with 59.0% within normal limits, 12.1% showing some evidence of diabetic retinopathy, and 6.4% exhibiting vision-threatening diabetic retinopathy. Follow-up appointments with ophthalmologists were recommended in 31.5% of exams due to indeterminate results, positive diabetic retinopathy (≥moderate or macular exudate), or other findings like age-related macular degeneration or suspected glaucoma. The program demonstrated high reproducibility across diverse healthcare settings, featuring a sustainable model with minimal camera downtime, standardized workflows, and financial support from grants, health systems, and clinical revenues. Despite COVID-19 pandemic challenges, this research emphasizes the program’s reproducibility, user-friendly evolution, and promising outcomes. Beyond technical contributions, it highlights human factors influencing program success. Future research could explore adherence to follow-up ophthalmological recommendations and its associated factors.
Bonilla‐Escobar et al. (Fri,) studied this question.