Quantitative analysis of radiosensitizing effect for magnetic hyperthermia‐radiation combined therapy on prostate cancer cells

Abstract Background Magnetic hyperthermia (MHT) has emerged as a promising therapeutic approach in the field of radiation oncology due to its superior precision in controlling temperature and managing the heating area compared to conventional hyperthermia. Recent studies have proposed solutions to address clinical safety concerns associated with MHT, which arise from the use of highly concentrated magnetic nanoparticles and the strong magnetic field needed to induce hyperthermic effects. Despite these efforts, challenges remain in quantifying therapeutic outcomes and developing treatment plan systems for combining MHT with radiation therapy (RT). Purpose This study aims to quantitatively measure the therapeutic effect, including radiation dose enhancement (RDE) in the magnetic hyperthermia‐radiation combined therapy (MHRT), using the equivalent radiation dose (EQD) estimation method. Methods To conduct EQD estimation for MHRT, we compared the therapeutic effects between the conventional hyperthermia‐radiation combined therapy (HTRT) and MHRT in human prostate cancer cell lines, PC3 and LNCaP. We adopted a clonogenic assay to validate RDE and the radiosensitizing effect induced by MHT. The data on survival fractions were analyzed using both the linear‐quadradic model and Arrhenius model to estimate the biological parameters describing RDE and radiosensitizing effect of MHRT for both cell lines through maximum likelihood estimation. Based on these parameters, a new survival fraction model was suggested for EQD estimation of MHRT. Results The newly designed model describing the MHRT effect, effectively captures the variations in thermal and radiation dose for both cell lines ( R 2 > 0.95), and its suitability was confirmed through the normality test of residuals. This model appropriately describes the survival fractions up to 10 Gy for PC3 cells and 8 Gy for LNCaP cells under RT‐only conditions. Furthermore, using the newly defined parameter r , the RDE effect was calculated as 29% in PC3 cells and 23% in LNCaP cells. EQD MHRT calculated through this model was 9.47 Gy for PC3 and 4.71 Gy for LNCaP when given 2 Gy and MHT for 30 min. Compared to EQD HTRT , EQD MHRT showed a 26% increase for PC3 and a 20% increase for LNCaP. Conclusions The proposed model effectively describes the changes of the survival fraction induced by MHRT in both cell lines and adequately represents actual data values through residual analysis. Newly suggested parameter r for RDE effect shows potential for quantitative comparisons between HTRT and MHRT, and optimizing therapeutic outcomes in MHRT for prostate cancer.