Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
House construction projects, known for their critical importance and complexity, often face significant constraints related to cost and time.These constraints necessitate the use of robust project management techniques to ensure timely and within-budget completion.This study presents an analysis of key project management methodologies, specifically the critical path method (CPM) and program evaluation and review technique (PERT), in the context of a house construction project.The methodologies employed include the identification of the earliest start and latest finish times, along with forward and backward passes to determine the project's critical path.A comparative analysis of CPM and PERT was conducted, revealing a minor variance of just two days between the two methods in determining project completion.The probability of completing the house construction project within 105 days was calculated to be 74.54%,indicating that both CPM and PERT are effective in ensuring timely project completion.The findings underscore the efficacy and practical benefits of employing CPM and PERT techniques in managing construction projects.
Jouda et al. (Tue,) studied this question.