Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract Regional climate models (RCMs) exhibit greater potential than global models (GCMs) in capturing geographical details of climate change arising from orography and land–water distribution, but dynamical downscalings are only available for a limited number of GCMs. The full GCM ensembles are much more representative. Furthermore, the current EURO-CORDEX RCM runs most likely underestimate future warming. Thus, neither GCMs nor RCMs as such constitute an ideal tool for preparing reliable spatially detailed climate projections. This study introduces an easy-to-use GCM-RCM hybrid method that takes advantage of the best properties of both model categories. The large-scale response is adopted from GCM simulations, but the pattern is enriched with RCM-simulated details. For temperature projections, the procedure resembles the conventional pattern-scaling technique. However, the spatial averages of temperature change used for scaling are calculated over an area surrounding each grid point, either by giving an equal weight to the entire area or by taking into account the land–sea distribution. For precipitation, a linearised version of the method has been formulated. The method is demonstrated by integrating spatial details from 12 EURO-CORDEX RCM simulations with the CMIP6 multi-GCM mean projection. The resulting temperature responses include RCM-generated spatial details of up to ∼ 1 ^ ∘ C while effectively correcting the general tendency of RCMs to underestimate warming in Europe. For precipitation, geographical details originating from the different CORDEX runs tend to diverge, resulting in a low signal-to-noise ratio. This probably reflects the substantial impact of internal variability on small-scale changes in precipitation.
Ruosteenoja et al. (Thu,) studied this question.