Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract Aristotle’s divine nous of Metaphysics Λ .9 is generally understood to exclusively characterise the Prime Mover-God. This paper challenges this view by (1) drawing out the strong congruity between our ‘best state’ and that of the Prime Mover in Λ .7 and (2) removing certain key obstacles to a more inclusive reading of Λ .9: our thought is not limited to the ‘human’ kind ( ho anthrōpinos nous , 1075a7), nor is our self-knowledge always a ‘by-product’ ( en parergōi , 1074b36). Noēsis noēseōs , I contend, equally applies to some forms of our thought. Hence, divine thought is accessible—indeed, even commendable—to us, just as the ‘divine life’ of Nicomachean Ethics X.7 is.
Hannah Laurens (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: