Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
The paper starts with the trajectory of ancient graffiti study since the 19th century. This study was well inserted in the scholarly context, paying particular attention to the differences of language use in relation to standard learned Latin (or Greek). In the 20th century, beyond scholarship, there was an overwhelming normative and historical perception that graffiti represented most of all unlearned people, those who were unable to have access to learned culture. This improved the knowledge about graffiti, but it continued to focus on distance from the rule. In the late 20th century there was a growing critical approach, considering that graffiti may produce evidence about people's daily lives. In this context, the edge has been able to produce a plethora of innovative interpretation. Brazil produced a critical approach, centring on a couple of subjects: popular culture and female agency. Popular culture means highlighting the originality of ordinary people culture. Then, within this approach, female agency. The authors then discuss some graffiti, enabling to discuss popular culture and female agency. The paper concludes by stressing how graffiti may be a way of promoting life, fostering living together, against hatred and destruction.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Lourdes Madalena Gazarini Conde Feitosa
Universidade Sagrado Coração
Renata Senna Garraffoni
San Antonio College
Pedro Paulo A. Funari
National Council for Scientific and Technological Development
Huarte de San Juan. Geografía e historia/Huarte de San Juan. Geografía e historia
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
Universidade Federal do Paraná
Universidade Sagrado Coração
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Feitosa et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/68e6784fb6db64358760243e — DOI: https://doi.org/10.48035/rhsj-gh.32.4
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: