Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
You have accessJournal of UrologyKidney Cancer: Epidemiology & Evaluation/Staging/Surveillance II (MP51)1 May 2024MP51-02 METABOLOMIC PROFILES OF METASTATIC RENAL CELL CARCINOMA Aditya Chakraborty, Brian Main, Liang Li, Ya-Chun Chan, Xiaohang Wang, Nico Verbeeck, Liam M. Spiers, Mike Williams, and Dean A. Troyer Aditya ChakrabortyAditya Chakraborty , Brian MainBrian Main , Liang LiLiang Li , Ya-Chun ChanYa-Chun Chan , Xiaohang WangXiaohang Wang , Nico VerbeeckNico Verbeeck , Liam M. SpiersLiam M. Spiers , Mike WilliamsMike Williams , and Dean A. TroyerDean A. Troyer View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/01.JU.0001009492.49624.4b.02AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Patients who are status-post radical or partial nephrectomy to treat renal cell carcinoma (RCC) undergo clinical surveillance regimes to investigate the presence of recurrent or metastatic disease. The clinical problem we're addressing is the frequency and intensity of surveillance after surgical resection of RCC. The aim of this study was to identify biomarkers which were statistically demonstrated to predict the development of metastatic disease. Identification of such biomarkers would create a diagnostic tool to aid clinicians in the management of patients on RCC surveillance. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective case control study of RCC patients, treated with surgical resection. Tumor samples were classified based on patients who either did or did not develop metastatic disease within 3 years. Freshly obtained RCC samples were collected, frozen, processed, and sent for metabolomic analysis using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS). Three different types of chemical groups were analyzed for each sample: Carboxyl, Amine-Phenol, and Hydroxyl. Metabolites were identified using a chemical library for cross-reference. LC-MS results were then analyzed with machine learning approaches and statistical models. Unsupervised machine learning (UMAP, Non-negative Matrix Factorization) was used for exploratory analysis of the data. Supervised machine learning, using both linear and nonlinear Support Vector Machines was used to construct classification models to distinguish between cases and controls, showing good classification performance with an area under the Precision-Recall curve (AUPRC) of 0.92 for the best-performing model. Repeated cross-validation was used to avoid overfitting and gain representative classification performance of the model. RESULTS: Statistical analysis yielded metabolites which were predominantly involved in differentiating metastatic from control samples. Definitively identified metabolites included the following: 4-Hydroxybutanoic acid, 3-Aminosalicylic acid, Indoxyl sulfate, Norcotinine, 3,4-Dihydroxyphenylpropanoic acid, Glutamyl-Glutamic acid, and N-ethylglycine. CONCLUSIONS: This study identifies certain metabolites which predict RCC metastasis. Metabolomics is a promising method of biochemical analysis for predicting outcomes such as RCC metastasis. Directions of future studies would include samples obtained from multiple centers to increase the sample size of identified metabolites. More research is necessary to strengthen support for using this diagnostic tool with certainty. Source of Funding: 1) NCI1R43CA228686-01A1 2) Provia Biologics 3) Eastern Virginia Medical School Biorepository 4) Urology of Virginia © 2024 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 211Issue 5SMay 2024Page: e841 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2024 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.Metrics Author Information Aditya Chakraborty More articles by this author Brian Main More articles by this author Liang Li More articles by this author Ya-Chun Chan More articles by this author Xiaohang Wang More articles by this author Nico Verbeeck More articles by this author Liam M. Spiers More articles by this author Mike Williams More articles by this author Dean A. Troyer More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...
Chakraborty et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: