Hf01-06 Racist Museums and the Didusch

You have accessJournal of UrologyHistory of Urology Forum I (HF01)1 May 2024HF01-06 RACIST MUSEUMS AND THE DIDUSCH Christian Creighton and Michael E. Moran Christian CreightonChristian Creighton and Michael E. MoranMichael E. Moran View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/01.JU.0001008828.35887.de.06AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: It is hard to believe that colonialism, books, and racism are related in any way to the modern practice of urology, let alone the William P. Didusch Center for Urologic History. However, disparities of culture as well as changing social responses make close encounters with museums, their purpose and messages susceptible to critique. By delving into the annals of urological history, we aim to shed light on the impact of these societal factors on the presentation and portrayal of urological topics over time. METHODS: Our research is grounded in an extensive review of the Didusch Center's collections of historical pamphlets, meeting records, and annual topics. We were specifically interested in the displays within the museum and exhibits available since 1971. By examining these artifacts, we seek to discern any references to minorities, minority representation and racism within the presentations and research presented, and its evolution through the years. RESULTS: Patel and his colleagues presented the history of the Forum last year, but the Didusch was longstanding prior to this, and historical topics of presentation had a long and interesting history at the Annual Meetings of the AUA going back to the 1950s. Our findings reveal a compelling history of urological presentations at the Didusch including displays of instruments, urologic procedures and specialization that are carefully crafted and avoid race and equity. Our review shows only one presentation on race in 2012 "Skeletons in the Closet." CONCLUSIONS: In the broader context, this paper underscores the ongoing efforts of urology programs across the United States to embrace inclusiveness and promote the recognition of shared human suffering within the realms of healthcare and urology. It emphasizes the essential truth that all of humanity shares the burden of urological ailments equally, and that a collaborative commitment to inclusivity is the path forward. Furthermore, this research contributes to a deeper comprehension of the profound interconnectedness between cultural disparities, social responses, and the messaging inherent to museums and their overarching purpose. Download PPT Source of Funding: None © 2024 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 211Issue 5SMay 2024Page: e280 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2024 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.Metrics Author Information Christian Creighton More articles by this author Michael E. Moran More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...