Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
You have accessJournal of UrologyStone Disease: Epidemiology 0.34, 0.32, 0.55 and 0.68 stone events per person-year respectively (Figure 1A). Despite categorization based on escalating stone risk, mean 24-hour urinary analyte values did not differ amongst the four groups (Figure 1B). Using a poisson regression the number of clinical stone risk factors obtainable by history or physical exam alone was predictive of stone recurrence. Baseline 24-hour urine values did not predict stone recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical characteristics based on history and physical exam used to identify high risk patients accurately identified those at risk of stone recurrence. Subsequent 24-hour urine testing did not identify a difference in metabolic activity on 24-hour urine testing to explain the increase in stone recurrence between within these risk groups. These data suggest that stone recurrence may be occurring by a process that is not well distinguished by 24-hour urine testing. Download PPT Source of Funding: N/A © 2024 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 211Issue 5SMay 2024Page: e743 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2024 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.Metrics Author Information Wilson Sui More articles by this author Kevin Chang More articles by this author Jorge Mena More articles by this author Heiko Yang More articles by this author Maria C. Velasquez More articles by this author Marshall Stoller More articles by this author Thomas Chi More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...
Sui et al. (Mon,) studied this question.