Comparative Assessment between High- and Low-Concentrate Contrast Media with Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography and Computed Tomography-Myocardial Perfusion Imaging

With the advancement of CT technology, the use of low tube voltages, and the clinical efficacy of low-concentration contrast media are gradually being demonstrated. In this study, we compared the differences between high- and low-concentration contrast media using Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography (CCTA) and Computed Tomography-Myocardial Perfusion Imaging (CT-MPI). These imaging techniques can simultaneously evaluate the patient's hemodynamic distribution and myocardium. The study results indicated that the quantitative analysis of tissues and blood vessels in CCTA showed that high-concentration contrast media led to a 5 to 10% increase in Hounsfield Units (HU), but the probability of significance was greater than 0.05. As a result of myocardial evaluation using CCTA and CT-MPI, the difference between the two contrast agents was within 5%, and the probability of significance was greater than 0.05. Qualitative analysis utilized nominal measurements in five categories and did not reveal significant differences between low- and high-concentration contrast media with a significance probability greater than 0.05. This study differed from existing studies by utilizing high- and low-concentration contrast media for CCTA and CT-MPI examinations. Analysis using CCTA and CT-MPI shows that low-concentration images are not inferior to images obtained using high-concentration contrast media.