Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Results: 1775 applicants (n=3690 SLOEs) were examined.1216 SLOEs were from students' home institutions; 2368 were from away rotations.This totaled 3584 included SLOEs.106 SLOEs were excluded due to inability to identify home or away.Table 1 demonstrates the mean scores, standard deviations, and p-values for home vs away rotation SLOEs.Only C3, anticipated rank list (RL) position (p=0.0017)was statistically significant in favor of higher rank for home SLOEs.Conclusions: This study demonstrated that most of the mean scores on the SLOE 2.0 were not statistically significant between home vs away institutions.The higher scores on the RL questions on home SLOE 2.0s was the only score signifying statistical significance compared to away SLOE 2.0.
Chesebro et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: