Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
. Given a metric space \ (M= (X, ) \), a weighted graph \ (G\) over \ (X\) is a metric \ (t\) -spanner of \ (M\) if for every \ (u, v X\), \ ( (u, v) G (u, v) t (u, v) \), where \ (G\) is the shortest path metric in \ (G\). In this paper, we construct spanners for finite sets in metric spaces in the online setting. Here, we are given a sequence of points \ ( (s₁, , sₙ) \), where the points are presented one at a time (i. e. , after \ (i\) steps, we see \ (Sᵢ = \s₁, , sᵢ\\) ). The algorithm is allowed to add edges to the spanner when a new point arrives; however, it is not allowed to remove any edge from the spanner. The goal is to maintain a \ (t\) -spanner \ (Gᵢ\) for \ (Sᵢ\) for all \ (i\), while minimizing the number of edges, and their total weight. We construct online \ ( (1+) \) -spanners in the Euclidean \ (d\) -space, \ ( (2k-1) (1+) \) -spanners for general metrics, and \ ( (2+) \) -spanners for ultrametrics. Most notably, in the Euclidean plane, we construct a \ ( (1+) \) -spanner with competitive ratio \ (O (^-3/2 ^-1 n) \), bypassing the classic lower bound \ ( (^-2) \) for lightness, which compares the weight of the spanner to that of the minimum spanning tree. Keywordsspannersonline algorithmsonline spannersmetric spacesapproximation algorithmsrandomized algorithmsMSC codes68W2568W2768W4068Rxx
Bhore et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: