Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract Traditional grammars of Sanskrit briefly address the periphrastic use of the verbs i - ‘go’, car - ‘move’, ās - ‘sit’ and sthā - ‘stand’ plus participle or gerund, which convey the meaning ‘to be continually/habitually x’ (x = participle or gerund), but an in-depth analysis of this set of auxiliaries remains a desideratum. This paper specifically addresses the periphrasis formed with the posture verb sthā - ‘stand’. I will investigate the diachronic development of this construction from the Rig-Veda to the Late Vedic period, and I will additionally offer a brief overview of the construction in the Epic Sanskrit language. On the basis of a large diachronically-oriented corpus, I will show that the Rig-Veda does not provide clear evidence of periphrases, whereas in Late Vedic periphrases with sthā - have unambiguously emerged. Furthermore, the data will be compared with the Avestan stā - periphrasis, showing that these two periphrases share certain affinities. This analysis aims to show that there exists a close relationship between this set of periphrases and the intensive category.
Beatrice Grieco (Mon,) studied this question.