Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Background: It is difficult to assess if the evaluation and treatment of female sexual dysfunction (FSD) has progressed. In 2003, the American Urogynecology Society (AUGS) surveyed members to measure practice patterns for FSD. Our objective was to administer a similar survey to current members of AUGS and the Society of Urodynamics, Female Pelvic Medicine and Urogenital Reconstruction (SUFU) to evaluate existing practice patterns.
Shoureshi et al. (Fri,) studied this question.