Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
ince the emergence of generative artificial intelligence (AI) in medical writing, there has been a major debate about its potential and risks for biomedical research and publications.The positions of authors, reviewers, and editors are divergent between those who consider AI an authentic author and those who reject its uses.Undoubtedly, AI-assisted technology (AI-AT) is dramatically changing the biomedical research landscape.No one can exclude its applications in medical manuscript writing.However, better comprehension of this new technology, its applications, risks, and challenges is vital for the medical publication world.It is creating new challenges for authors, reviewers, and editors.When reviewing and editing an AI-written manuscript, many questions must be answered: Is it accurate?Is it ethical?Is it non-biased?Is it complete?Is there AI hallucination?
R. Hajji (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: