The purpose of this study is to provide basic data to solidify theinstitutional foundation by analyzing the contents of the “Youth Activity PromotionOrdinance”. The targets of analysis are 28 ordinances extracted from the localgovernment legal information system. As a result of the analysis, first, the ordinanceproposed various projects according to the regional characteristics of local governments. The Gangwon headquarters, the Chungnam headquarters, and theEunpyeong-gu ordinance in Seoul compulsorily stipulated the youth participation andautonomy activities, while Eunpyeong-gu in Seoul stipulated the youth council. Thispoint needs to be institutional spread. Second, 7.14 projects per ordinance wereproposed to promote youth activities. Third, the enforcement system showed a largegap between metropolitan and basic local governments. Through this, it wasproposed to expand mandatory regulations, systematize financial support methods,and specify support for private youth organizations with expertise to ensureimplementation.
Shin et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: