Electronic voting (e-voting) has become an essential topic in the modernization of democratic systems, with promises of accessibility, faster counting, and reduced logistical challenges compared to traditional paper ballots. Yet, widespread adoption has been hindered by persistent trust and security concerns. Vulnerabilities such as malware, server compromise, insider threats, and limited verifiability have generated skepticism regarding the integrity of e-voting platforms. Blockchain technology has emerged as a disruptive innovation capable of reshaping this discourse. Its intrinsic properties—immutability, decentralization, transparency, and consensus-driven validation—directly address many of the fundamental challenges associated with securing digital elections. This manuscript provides a comprehensive exploration of blockchain-based electronic voting, with particular emphasis on the trust and security challenges that shape its practical deployment. Drawing on global case studies, theoretical models, and simulation insights, the research examines how blockchain can ensure tamper resistance, facilitate end-to-end verifiability, and empower voters through transparent audit trails. Key challenges such as scalability bottlenecks, voter anonymity risks, usability barriers, and regulatory gaps are analyzed in depth. The results indicate that hybrid blockchain architectures, which integrate advanced cryptographic techniques such as zero-knowledge proofs, homomorphic encryption, and sharding, hold promise for balancing the competing demands of scalability, privacy, and trust. Furthermore, blockchain must be supported by strong institutional frameworks, inclusive accessibility measures, and continuous technical audits to achieve legitimacy in electoral processes. By systematically mapping both the opportunities and limitations, this research contributes to the ongoing discourse on how technology can strengthen democratic resilience in the digital era. Ultimately, blockchain-enabled voting should be regarded not as a replacement but as an augmentation of existing systems, combining the strengths of distributed technologies with constitutional safeguards to advance secure, transparent, and inclusive electoral participation.
D. Aswini (Sat,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: