This study explored the impact of automated writing evaluation (AWE) on the development of metacognitive awareness in English as a foreign language (EFL) students’ persuasive writing within Chinese higher education. Grounded in self-regulated learning theory and Flavell’s (1979) metacognitive framework, the research investigates how AWE influences students’ abilities to plan, monitor, and evaluate their writing processes. Employing a single-group mixed-methods design over a 16-week intervention period, data were collected from 100 students through the Metacognitive Awareness Writing Questionnaire (MAWQ), reflective journals, and post-intervention interviews with a randomly selected subset of 10 participants. Quantitative results revealed negligible overall gains in metacognitive awareness but a recalibration of self-perceptions in areas such as planning and conditional knowledge. In contrast, qualitative data offered a more nuanced view. The students reported increased attention to text structure and grammar and demonstrated selective adoption of AWE feedback. However, many expressed uncertainties when faced with ambiguous or overly general suggestions, highlighting the ongoing need for teacher support. These findings suggest that while AWE tools such as PIGAI may effectively facilitate surface-level revisions, their capacity to foster deeper metacognitive engagement is limited without instructional scaffolding. To enhance pedagogical outcomes, it is recommended that AWE systems be integrated into a broader instructional framework, supported by explicit strategy training. Incorporating clearer rubrics and more contextualized, explanation-rich feedback may further promote students’ independent and strategic engagement with the writing process.
Wang et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: