Waste generated from agricultural activities is anticipated to increase in the future, especially in less developed countries, and this could cause environmental health risks if these wastes are not well managed. The anaerobic digestion (AD) by co-digesting organic waste is a technology used to produce biogas while utilizing biodigestate as a biofertilizer; however, AD requires a lot of water to be efficient, which could pose water challenges to arid areas. This study evaluated biogas production under semi-dry conditions by augmenting the process with a high-water content wild melon and determined the nutrient composition of the resultant biodigestate. Batch studies of AD were performed to evaluate methane potential of the different animal waste using an online and standardized Automatic Methane Potential Test System (AMPTS) II light for approximately 506 h (21 days) at 38 °C. The highest biomethane potential (BMP) determined for mono and co-substrate digestion was 29.5 NmL CH4/g VS (CD) and 63.3 NmL CH4/g VS (CMWM), respectively, which was calculated from AMPTS biomethane yield of 3166.2 NmL (CD) and 1480.6 NmL (CMWM). Water-displacement method was also used to compare biogas yield in wet and semi-dry AD. The results showed high biogas yield of 8480 mL for CM (mono-substrate) and 10,975 mL for CMCC in wet AD. Semi-dry AD was investigated by replacing water with a wild melon (WM), and the highest biogas production was 8000 mL from the CMCC combination augmented with WM. Generally, in wet AD, co-digestion was more effective in biogas production than mono-substrate AD. The biodigestate from different substrate combinations were also evaluated for nutrient composition using X-ray Fluorescence (XRF) analysis, and all the samples contained fair amount of essential nutrients such as calcium (Ca), phosphorus (P), potassium (K) and microelements such as chloride (Cl), magnesium (Mn), iron (Fe), zinc (Zn). This study successfully implemented semi-dry AD from co-digested animal wastes to produce biogas as an energy solution and biofertilizer for crop production, thereby creating a closed-loop system that supports a circular bioeconomy. In addition, the study confirmed that lowering the water content in the AD process is feasible without compromising substantial biogas production. This technology, when optimized and well implemented, could provide sustainable biogas production in areas with water scarcity, therefore making the biogas production process accessible to rural communities.
Bontsi et al. (Fri,) studied this question.