Numerous valuable information is available on the Internet, and many individuals rely on mass media as their primary source of information. Various views, comments, expressions, and opinions on social networks have been a tremendous source of information. Harvesting free, resourceful information through social media makes text mining a powerful tool for analyzing public opinions on various issues across diverse social networks. Various research projects have implemented text sentiment analysis through machine and deep learning approaches. Social media text often expresses sentiment through complex syntax and negation (e.g., implicit and double negation and nested clauses), which many classifiers mishandle. We propose hybrid negation, a clause-aware approach that combines (i) explicit/implicit/double-negation rules, (ii) dependency-based scope detection, (iii) a TextBlob back-off for phrase polarity, and (iv) an MLP-learned clause-weighting module that aggregates clause-level scores. Across 156,539 tweets (three-class sentiment), we evaluate six negation strategies and 228 model configurations with and without SMOTE (applied strictly within training folds). Hybrid Negation achieves 98.582% accuracy, 98.196% precision, 98.189% recall, and 98.193% F1 with BERT, outperforming rule-only and antonym/synonym baselines. Ablations show each component contributes to the model’s performance, with dependency scope and double negations offering the largest gains. Per-class results, confidence intervals, and paired tests with multiple-comparison control confirm statistically significant improvements. We release code and preprocessing scripts to support reproducibility.
Qorib et al. (Mon,) studied this question.