This study revealed critical divergences in online health information-seeking across stakeholder groups. Patients increasingly rely on social media platforms like Reddit and TikTok for peer-driven narratives, whereas practitioners are more inclined to exclusively consult peer-reviewed literature. This divide creates information asymmetry that can undermine shared decision-making when patients are informed by experiential knowledge that practitioners lack or dismiss. All groups began online searches with Google but followed distinct pathways and relied primarily on surface-level credibility markers rather than systematic evaluation. To bridge these divides, the authors recommend integrating patient-sourced information training into medical education, incorporating information-seeking discussions into clinical encounters, and developing resources that bridge experiential and clinical knowledge. Researchers should also accelerate evidence translation through rapid translation mechanisms and partnerships with trusted platforms. As artificial intelligence tools increasingly shape health information access, understanding these evolving patterns remains essential for effective collaborative decision-making and potentially improved health outcomes.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
John Geracitano
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Kumara Mendis
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Saif Khairat
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
The Permanente Journal
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Geracitano et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6971bfdff17b5dc6da021fb9 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.7812/tpp/25.168