Abstract Genetic counseling supervision (GCS), a structured process in which a professional supports a supervisee through reflection, case discussion, and skills development, plays a crucial role in ensuring the quality and effectiveness of genetic counseling services worldwide. Despite its advantages, the implementation and consistency of GCS practices vary significantly across different regions, leading to disparities in the quality of genetic counseling services globally. The research was based on interviews with key professionals recognized as representatives of genetic counseling from diverse regions, including America, Europe, Asia, Africa, and Oceania. Data were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis, identifying three overarching themes: (1) Historical and Structural Foundations of Access to GCS, including professional origins and institutional pathways, recognition of the profession, and policy, governance, and regulatory frameworks; (2) Meanings, Functions, and Perceived Value of GCS, encompassing its protective function against burnout, diversity of definitions and scope, and perceived contributions to practice quality; and (3) Forces Shaping the Implementation of GCS, covering genomics and increasing biomedical complexity, constraining pressures such as resources and workload, and enabling factors, such as networks, education, and digital solutions. These results indicate a promising shift toward broader recognition and integration of GCS, offering valuable insights for policymakers, genetic counselors and other healthcare professionals, and contributing to discussions on informed decision‐making and international collaboration.
Guimarães et al. (Wed,) studied this question.