Background/Objectives: Severe COVID-19 is marked by IL-6-driven inflammation, endothelial injury, and dysregulated coagulation. Although IL-6 antagonists improve clinical outcomes, their effects on the temporal evolution of coagulation and fibrinolysis remain insufficiently defined. This study characterizes inflammatory, endothelial, coagulation, and fibrinolytic trajectories following IL-6 receptor blockade in critically ill COVID-19 patients. Methods: In this prospective, exploratory multicenter case series (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05218369), 15 ICU patients with PCR- or antigen-confirmed COVID-19 received tocilizumab per protocol. Serial sampling at five timepoints (T0–T4) included routine laboratories, comprehensive viscoelastic hemostatic assays (ClotPro®), and ELISA-based endothelial and fibrinolytic biomarkers. Analyses were primarily descriptive, emphasizing temporal patterns through boxplots; paired Wilcoxon tests with FDR correction contextualized within-patient changes. Results: Patients exhibited marked inflammation, hyperfibrinogenemia, endothelial activation, and delayed fibrinolysis at baseline. IL-6 blockade induced rapid suppression of CRP and PCT, progressive declines in fibrinogen, and modest platelet increases. In contrast, vWF antigen and activity further increased, indicating persistent endothelial dysfunction. Viscoelastic testing showed preserved thrombin generation and sustained high clot firmness, while biochemical markers (rising PAI-1, modest PAP increase, and progressively increasing D-dimer) and VHA indices suggested ongoing antifibrinolytic activity despite resolution of systemic inflammation. Conclusions: IL-6 antagonism was associated with rapid attenuation of systemic inflammation but was not accompanied by normalization of endothelial activation or fibrinolytic resistance. The observed hemostatic profile was consistent with attenuation of inflammation-associated coagulation features, while endothelial and prothrombotic alterations appeared to persist during follow-up, warranting further investigation in larger controlled studies.
Kovács et al. (Thu,) studied this question.