Habitat fragmentation is reshaping ecosystems worldwide, reducing connectivity, eroding genetic diversity, and limiting species’ capacity to adapt to rapid environmental change. Conservation management responses to fragmentation generally follow three pathways: restoring habitats to rebuild connectivity, translocating individuals to bolster declining populations, and, more recently, directly managing adaptive genetic variation. We synthesize the ecological and genetic consequences of fragmentation and evaluate these management pathways along a continuum from landscape-scale interventions to genome-level strategies. Habitat restoration can reconnect patches and improve demo-graphic stability, but its genetic outcomes remain uncertain without baseline and post-restoration monitoring. Translocation offers a more immediate means of restoring gene flow but introduces demographic risks, potential impacts on source populations, and uncertainties in establishment and long-term fitness. Emerging genomic technologies now support a third approach: Targeted Genetic Intervention (TGI), which aims to accelerate the spread of beneficial genetic variants or enhance adaptive potential directly. Although promising, TGI faces significant challenges, including polygenic trait architecture, risks to genome-wide diversity, and the need for robust ethical and governance frameworks. Across all pathways, genetic data are essential for prioritizing actions, diagnosing vulnerable species and populations, and restoring the evolutionary potential necessary for long-term persistence in increasingly fragmented landscapes.
Ngeve et al. (Thu,) studied this question.