Abstract Persistent demand for wildlife‐derived products perpetuates international trafficking and the exploitation of legitimate globalized transport networks. The annual movement of millions of shipping cargo containers, of which few are inspected due to resource constraints, facilitates the smuggling of large quantities of wildlife contraband. Rapid, noninvasive screening tools are essential for border control agencies to effectively detect and intercept wildlife trafficking attempts, though such tools are currently limited. Detection dog programs could be highly effective in this context; however, their capacity to screen large volumes of cargo without disrupting port operations remains a challenge. We explored the feasibility of pairing an air extraction device, which samples air from sealed containers, with canine detection to improve screening measures. To evaluate this method, we used pelts from adult specimens of the African lion ( Panthera leo ), cheetah ( Acinonyx jubatus ), leopard ( Panthera pardus ), snow leopard ( Panthera uncia ), and tiger ( Panthera tigris ) concealed in containers to simulate smuggling scenarios. On average across the container configurations trialed, the detection dog achieved high diagnostic sensitivity (97.6%, 95% CI 95.1–100.0) and specificity (84.8%, 95% CI 79.1–90.6). Detection accuracy was not significantly influenced by airflow conditions (extraction only vs. mixed‐mode ventilation) or pelt arrangement within the containers. These findings highlight the potential of this approach in enhancing the detection of concealed wildlife products. However, the air extraction protocol must be validated under real‐world operational conditions to confirm its practicability. Through the integration of extraction‐based air sampling into existing screening frameworks, this approach could offer a scalable, noninvasive strategy to strengthen wildlife trafficking detection.
Moloney et al. (Sat,) studied this question.