This paper formalizes the relation between Monos and Logos through their shared predicate of identity. It is shown that Monos and Logos are isomorphic with respect to the logical operation they employ (fixation / identity), while radically diverging in the ontological status of that operation. In Logos, identity functions as the foundation of causal coherence and representation; in Monos, absolute identity constitutes a prohibited state that logically excludes becoming itself. From this divergence, processuality follows as a structural necessity rather than a philosophical interpretation. The proposed model establishes the basis of Metamonist ontodynamics as a logical continuation of predicative analysis.
Andrii Myshko (Thu,) studied this question.