What question did this study set out to answer?

To investigate how international human rights obligations are incorporated into subnational laws in Nigeria and their effectiveness.

February 9, 2026Open Access

International Human Rights Obligations into Subnational Legislative Drafting in Federal Systems: Evidence from Disability Rights Lawmaking in Nigeria

Key Points

To investigate how international human rights obligations are incorporated into subnational laws in Nigeria and their effectiveness.
Analysis of federal and state disability legislation in Nigeria
Examination of doctrinal pathways and institutional mechanisms
Evaluation of political factors influencing legislative compliance
Assessment of enforcement challenges and civil society engagement
Recommendations for treaty-consistent drafting and intergovernmental strategies
Identified gaps in state-level disability legislation
Highlighted challenges like limited enforcement and intergovernmental coordination
Recommended legislative drafting techniques for better human rights alignment
Emphasized the need for enhanced civil society involvement
Showed that merely ratifying treaties is insufficient for effective implementation

Abstract

Abstract: This paper examines the integration of international human rights obligations into subnational legislative processes in federal systems, using disability rights lawmaking in Nigeria as an illustrative case. Despite Nigeria’s ratification of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) and the enactment of federal disability legislation, significant disparities exist in the adoption, alignment, and enforcement of state-level laws. The study highlights the doctrinal pathways, institutional mechanisms, and political factors that influence subnational compliance, including legislative incorporation, judicial interpretation, cooperative federalism, and participatory lawmaking. It further analyzes substantive and institutional gaps in state legislation, revealing challenges such as limited enforcement capacity, weak civil society engagement, and uneven intergovernmental coordination. Drawing on these findings, the paper outlines treaty-consistent legislative drafting techniques, intergovernmental harmonization strategies, and participatory governance approaches that enhance democratic legitimacy and rights realization at the subnational level. The study contributes to the theoretical understanding of multilevel human rights governance, demonstrating that effective treaty implementation in federal systems requires more than formal ratification; it depends on coordinated legal, institutional, and civil society mechanisms that bridge the gap between international norms and practical outcomes. Finally, the paper identifies lessons for policy and legislative reform and proposes avenues for future research on the operationalization of human rights in decentralized governance contexts. Keywords: Federal System, Human Rights, Disability Rights, Subnational Legislative Drafting, Nigeria. Title: International Human Rights Obligations into Subnational Legislative Drafting in Federal Systems: Evidence from Disability Rights Lawmaking in Nigeria Author: Favour Ojochide Raphael, Olamide Olatomike Ajala, Amina Catherine Peter-Anyebe, Toyosi Motilola Olala, Bukola Oloba International Journal of Recent Research in Social Sciences and Humanities (IJRRSSH) ISSN 2349-7831 Vol. 13, Issue 1, January 2026 - March 2026 Page No: 14-29 Paper Publications Website: www.paperpublications.org Published Date: 05-February-2026 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18491757 Paper Download Link (Source) https://www.paperpublications.org/upload/book/International%20Human%20Rights%20Obligations-05022026-1.pdf

Read Full Paperexternally

AI에게 질문

Bookmark

View Full Paper