Endoscopic combined aortic and mitral valve surgery had 3.6% in-hospital mortality and 87% survival at 46 months, showing feasibility and favorable mid-term outcomes.
Does endoscopic combined aortic and mitral valve surgery yield acceptable in-hospital mortality and mid-term survival in patients requiring concomitant valve surgery?
Endoscopic combined aortic and mitral valve surgery is feasible and associated with low in-hospital mortality (3.6%) and favorable mid-term survival (87% at 46 months).
Absolute Event Rate: 0% vs 0%
Abstract OBJECTIVES Endoscopic surgery has emerged as an evolution of minimally invasive approaches, but evidence regarding its application in combined valve procedures remains scarce. This study evaluates its feasibility and mid-term outcomes in concomitant aortic and mitral valve surgery. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed all consecutive patients undergoing endoscopic concomitant mitral and aortic valve surgery from January 2016 to July 2025. Cardiopulmonary bypass was established via peripheral cannulation. All procedures were performed through a right mini-thoracotomy using a 30° thoracoscope. The primary end-point was in-hospital mortality. Secondary end-points included major postoperative complications, a composite early outcome (in-hospital mortality, stroke, major bleeding requiring revision, postoperative myocardial infarction, or dialysis), and mid-term survival. Univariable logistic regression was used to identify predictors of the composite early postoperative outcome. Follow-up was 100% complete. RESULTS The analysis included 111 patients (median age 70 years IQR 62–76, 55 males, median EuroSCORE II 3.3 IQR 1.90–5.04). The aortic valve was replaced in all cases. Mitral valve was repaired in 54 cases and replaced in 57. Concomitant procedures were performed in 44 cases. Median CPB and cross-clamp times were 198 164–233 and 139 117–160 min respectively. In-hospital mortality was 3.6%, with low rates of stroke (3.6%), bleeding (8.1%), and dialysis (5.4%). At a median follow-up of 46 months, overall survival was 87%. Reduced eGFR, coronary artery disease, chronic lung disease and peripheral arteriopathy were significantly associated with the composite early outcome. CONCLUSIONS Endoscopic technique can be successfully applied to combined aortic and mitral valve surgery, encouraging its broader adoption.
Cresce et al. (Wed,) reported a other. Endoscopic combined aortic and mitral valve surgery had 3.6% in-hospital mortality and 87% survival at 46 months, showing feasibility and favorable mid-term outcomes.