This paper proposes a new method for causal discovery based on a novel dependence measurement criterion, namely, Multi-level Wavelet Mapping Correlation (MWMC). MWMC captures nonlinear dependencies between variables by measuring their correlations across multiple levels of wavelet mappings. From a theoretical perspective, we show that the empirical estimate of MWMC converges exponentially fast to its population quantity. Under the null hypothesis of independence, we further design a permutation-based independence testing procedure, termed the Wavelet Independence Test (WIT), built upon MWMC. We prove that WIT not only effectively controls the Type I error rate (false positives), but also guarantees that the Type II error rate (false negatives) is upper bounded by \ (O (n^-1) \), where \ (n\) denotes the sample size, even with a finite number of permutations. Building on these theoretical guarantees, we derive a causal discovery method by integrating MWMC-based WIT into standard causal discovery pipelines. Extensive experiments on (conditional) independence testing and causal discovery using both synthetic and real-world datasets with varying sample sizes demonstrate that our approach consistently outperforms existing independence testing and causal discovery methods in terms of reduced Type II error rates and statistically validated performance improvements. Impact Statement — Causal discovery is a fundamental task in knowledge discovery, aiming to uncover the underlying data-generating mechanisms in order to support more accurate and interpretable predictions. Statistical independence tests and conditional independence (CI) tests have long served as core tools in this area. To improve the reliability of independence testing, we propose a novel test, WIT, which achieves lower Type II error rates in 19 out of 25 distinct experimental scenarios involving diverse data distributions, compared to 15 out of 25 for the strongest existing baseline. We further apply WIT to CI testing and causal discovery, and extensive empirical results show that it consistently improves the performance of multiple causal discovery algorithms across a range of experimental settings.
Ren et al. (Wed,) studied this question.