What question did this study set out to answer?

The study aims to establish expert consensus on key parameters for assessing surgical competence in tension band wiring for olecranon fractures.

February 21, 2026Open Access

Defining Technical Competence in Olecranon Fracture Fixation: An International Delphi Consensus on Tension Band Wiring Assessment

Key Points

The study aims to establish expert consensus on key parameters for assessing surgical competence in tension band wiring for olecranon fractures.
Conducted a modified four-round Delphi process with 98 orthopedic trauma surgeons.
In Round 1, panelists proposed performance parameters and common errors.
Parameters rated for importance using a 5-point Likert-like scale in Round 2.
Specific score ranges for fracture models were established in Round 3; results not reported.
Final round involved scoring parameters from 1 to 10 to determine their impact on procedural quality.
43 parameters were retained for evaluating technical performance.
Top parameters included achieving anatomical fracture reduction (mean score: 9.7) and figure-of-8 cerclage wire placement (9.4).
A very strong correlation was found between importance ratings and final scores (r = 0.91, p < 0.001).

Abstract

AbstractBackground Tension band wiring (TBW) is a widely used technique for displaced olecranon fractures but carries a substantial risk of complications, often due to technical errors. Despite being a designated core competency in orthopedic curricula, no standardized, procedure-specific tool exists to assess technical performance in TBW. This study aimed to establish international expert consensus on assessment parameters for evaluating surgical competence in TBW of simple transverse olecranon fractures. Methods A modified four-round Delphi process was conducted with 98 orthopedic trauma surgeons, primarily AO faculty. In Round 1, panelists proposed key performance parameters and typical errors. Responses were analyzed and processed by a steering committee. In Round 2, 46 parameters were rated for importance using a 5-point Likert-like scale; parameters with mean scores ≥3.0 were retained. In Round 3, specific score ranges were determined for each bone and fracture model; these results are not presented in this study. In the final round, experts assigned scores (1–10) to each retained parameter to reflect its impact on procedural quality. Descriptive statistics were used, and Pearson's correlation coefficient assessed the relationship between importance ratings and scores. Results A total of 43 parameters were retained, covering fracture reduction (8 items), K-wire placement (14), cerclage wire configuration (18), and end-of-procedure verification (3). The highest scoring parameter was "achieving anatomical fracture reduction" (mean score: 9.7), followed by "placement of the cerclage wire in a figure-of-8 configuration" (9.4). A very strong correlation was observed between importance and final scores (r = 0.91, p Conclusions This international consensus study defines a comprehensive set of assessment parameters for TBW of olecranon fractures. The tool supports both structured evaluation and high-specificity feedback—key drivers of skill acquisition in competency-based surgical training. It may be used directly in feedback settings or adapted for simulation platforms and structured curricula. Level of Evidence Level V, Treatment Study, Delphi Process

AI에게 질문

Bookmark

View Full Paper