ABSTRACT Background Contrast administration may contribute to patient anxiety and safety concerns during magnetic resonance imaging ( MRI) , yet patient experiences specific to contrast‐enhanced MRI ( CE ‐ MRI ) examination remain underexplored. Purpose To explore patients' experiences during CE ‐ MRI examination, focusing on anxiety levels and safety perceptions. Study Type Questionnaire‐based study with follow‐up patient interviews. Subjects Two hundred and three adult patients undergoing CE‐MRI in public hospitals; 28 participated in follow up interviews. Field Strength/Sequence 1.5 Tesla/standardized MRI scanning protocols across multiple body regions comprised 6–17 sequences per examination, with total table times ranging from 30 to 50 min, depending on the anatomical region examined. Assessment A structured questionnaire consisted of 31 items covering demographic characteristics, scan related information, experience with the CE‐MRI examination, including information received, and anxiety assessment before, during, and after the CE‐MRI examination using a four‐point Likert scale. Following the CE‐MRI examination, 28 patients from this original cohort participated in semi‐structured interviews to explore their anxiety levels and perceptions of safety during the examination. Statistical Test Quantitative data were analyzed using SPSS, and a p value < 0.05 was considered significant. While qualitative data were analyzed thematically using NVivo software. Results Forty‐six percent of patients reported increased anxiety during contrast administration, and 26.1% rated the information provided about the examination unclear. It was found that 35% felt the examination did not meet their expectations based on the information given. Anxiety was more prevalent among females (Mean = 1.71), younger patients (Mean = 2.04), and those with higher education levels (Mean = 1.96). Qualitative findings identified key anxiety triggers, including sensory discomfort, fear of unknown outcomes, and poor timing or poor clarity of information. Empathetic communication and clarity were perceived as essential anxiety‐reducing factors. Notably, anxiety levels significantly decreased after the examination (χ 2 = 24.955). Data Conclusion Anxiety levels were influenced by sex, age, education level, the provided information, and the quality of communication. Evidence Level 4. Stage of Technology Efficacy Stage 3 (Diagnostic Thinking).
Alsharif et al. (Thu,) studied this question.