This article develops a central thesis of the Philosophy of Belonging formulated by Carlos Federico Obregón Díaz: freedom and belonging are not opposites but mutually reinforcing dimensions of human development. Challenging classical liberal interpretations that equate freedom with independence from social ties, the paper argues that real freedom emerges from secure emotional, institutional, and structural belonging. Drawing on interdisciplinary foundations in philosophy, economics, neuroscience, and development theory, the study shows that emotional insecurity limits rational agency, weak institutions undermine effective rights, and fragile social structures transform freedom into a merely formal condition. In contrast, secure belonging enables rational deliberation, social cooperation, market stability, and inclusive development. The article reinterprets Adam Smith within a moral-institutional framework of belonging, emphasizing that self-interest becomes socially productive only when embedded in ethical norms and inclusive institutions. It further argues that the historical success of modern capitalism depended not primarily on free trade alone but on the expansion of the middle class, democratic institutions, welfare systems, technological investment, and global integration. The work proposes an integrated theoretical model where:freedom = belonging + institutional security + human capacities + fair development. By linking emotional belonging, institutional design, global integration, and human flourishing, the article contributes to contemporary debates in political philosophy, development economics, institutional theory, and global justice. It positions the Philosophy of Belonging as a unified framework connecting freedom, justice, markets, and human development in the 21st century.
Carlos Federico Obregon Diaz (Fri,) studied this question.