Innovative pedagogies that nurture higher-order competencies such as autonomy and problem-solving are critical in graduate STEM contexts. This study conceptualizes Thinking Classrooms as a pedagogical framework for graduate engineering education and examines how classroom practices associated with this approach support the development of autonomous learning and complex problem-solving. Drawing on classroom-based evidence collected over multiple academic cohorts in a master’s program in mechanical engineering, we describe patterns of student engagement, instructor adaptations, and evolving learning behaviors. Our findings highlight the potential of Thinking Classroom principles to inform instructional design, foster learner agency, and strengthen disciplinary problem-solving practices in postgraduate engineering education. We discuss implications for curriculum development and future research directions in STEM education.
Romero-Sánchez et al. (Mon,) studied this question.