In the current context of environmental sustainability and reduced agricultural inputs, biostimulants represent one of the most efficient, eco-friendly and innovative strategies to preserve plants from biotic and abiotic stresses and to ensure sustainable agriculture. Ranging from benefic microorganisms, seaweed extracts, and humic acids to complex carbohydrates such as polysaccharides and oligosaccharides, these biostimulants are able to increase plant growth, photosynthetic efficiency, root development and nutrient uptake when they are applied during seed priming as foliar sprays or as liquid and solid soil amendments. The mechanisms underlying their effective action on plants are mainly related to the enhancement of antioxidant defenses and the regulation of hormonal pathways, particularly auxin homeostasis and transport. Several studies reported the relevance of biostimulant application in promoting root growth. In plants, roots play crucial roles, performing a variety of functions such as nutrients and water uptake, mediating stress perception and adaptation, influencing the rhizosphere microbiome, and providing structural support. The effectiveness and perception of polysaccharide-based biostimulants (PBs) are highly dependent on crucial factors, including the degree of depolymerization and the chemical modifications such as acetylation, methylation, sulfation, and oxidation. Furthermore, not all receptors and co-receptors involved in the recognition of PBs have yet been identified. However, there remain many gaps in our understanding regarding the interaction between biostimulants and roots, which is still far from fully elucidated. For these reasons, the present review provides a comprehensive overview of current research on biostimulants–root interactions, with a particular focus on polysaccharide-based biostimulants. It highlights the mechanisms involved in their recognition by plants roots, from perception to response, and the subsequent signaling cascades and the molecular pathways activated, with special emphasis on existing knowledge gaps and future research perspectives.
Ahchouch et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: