Precision weeding is crucial for maximizing crop yields and minimizing herbicide use. However, deploying standard deep learning models in agriculture faces challenges due to the high morphological diversity of weeds and the computational constraints of edge devices. Hence, this study proposes MCS-YOLO, a lightweight detection model based on the YOLOv8 architecture. First, a channel-level Mamba module is integrated into the backbone to model long-range feature dependencies and enhance global texture representation. The LMAB module employs parallel depthwise separable convolutions with varying receptive fields and coordinate attention to improve multi-scale weed discrimination. To mitigate feature blurring and misalignment during upsampling, the LCAU module adopts dynamic offset sampling beyond fixed interpolation methods. Finally, the SCS-Head integrates dual-branch depthwise separable convolution with channel shuffling to reduce parameter redundancy while preserving efficient feature expression. Experimental results on the Weed-Crop dataset demonstrate that MCS-YOLO achieves 76.4% mAP@50 and 38.3% mAP@50–95, outperforming YOLOv8s by 3.1% and 1.5%, respectively. Furthermore, the parameter count is reduced by 20.7%, from 11.13 M to 8.83 M, and GFLOPs are reduced by 39.6%, from 28.5 to 17.2. These results confirm that MCS-YOLO effectively balances a lightweight design with high detection accuracy, offering a viable solution for real-time weed detection and automated weeding on embedded agricultural platforms.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Qi Yan
Ministry of Agriculture
Ning Jin
Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs
Si Li
China Agricultural University
Agriculture
Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs
National Engineering Research Center for Information Technology in Agriculture
Shenyang Jianzhu University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Yan et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69a3d867ec16d51705d2f2af — DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture16050539