Optimal sensor placement (OSP) for structural health monitoring of large-scale space grid structures must enable reliable identification of localized member deterioration with sparse instrumentation. Modal-based OSP criteria optimize observability of a healthy model but do not directly minimize uncertainty in substructure-level damage parameters. We partition the structure into substructures, simulate axial and biaxial bending stiffness-loss cases, and compute truncated modal flexibility. Each element is encoded by stacked end-node flexibility submatrices over m=6 modes. A multi-task, zero-anchored multi-layer perceptron is trained to regress three nonnegative damage parameters and classify damage presence using losses tailored for small-damage accuracy. Sensor sensitivities are obtained by automatic differentiation of the surrogate with respect to flexibility features and aggregated with scenario weights emphasizing critical bending and neighbor-substructure interference scenarios. A greedy D-optimal design then maximizes the log-determinant of a regularized Fisher information matrix under practical coverage constraints; substructure selections are merged into a globally feasible layout. On a representative space grid, the method improves task-oriented identifiability over EFI and MKE across budgets Ktot=30–60 (higher-damage D-optimality, lower A-optimality trace, and reduced proxy variance indicators), while yielding lower modal log-determinants. These findings indicate risk-weighted, substructure-first task design as an alternative to purely modal criteria for substructure-level damage-parameter identification.
Jiakai Xiu (Sun,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: